2019.04 Paper Weekly 3
- Science of Science
-
- Motivation: government R&D budget
- Research question: decision support systems to maximize the total expected R&D output
- Proposed method:
- R&D output prediction model
- robust optimization technique to hedge against uncertainty
-
A multi-objective approach for profit-driven feature selection in credit scoring
- Motivation: feature selection in credit scoring
- Research gap: standard feature selection only rely on statistical criteria
- Proposed method:
- extend the use of profit measures to feature selection
- develop a multi-objective wrapper framework based on the NSGA-II genetic algorithm with two fitness functions: the Expected Maximum Profit (EMP) and the number of features.
-
A Novel Method for Topic Linkages Between ScientificPublications and Patents
- Motivation: understanding the relationships between science and technology.
- Research Gap: Previous studies on the linkages mainly focus on the analysis of nonpatent references on the front page of patents, or the resulting citation- link networks, but with unsatisfactory performance.
- Proposed method:
- a novel statistical entity-topic model (named the CCorrLDA2 model), armed with the collapsed Gibbs sampling inference algorithm, is proposed to discover the hidden topics respectively from the academic articles and patents.
- a topic linkages construction problem is transformed into the well-known optimal transportation problem after topic similarity is calculated on the basis of symmetrized Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence.
-
- Motivation: data paper
- Research gap: Research examining how data papers report data events, such as data transactions and manipulations, is limited.
- Method & findings:
- A content analysis was conducted examining the full texts of 82 data papers
- Data events recorded for each paper were organized into a set of 17 categories.
- The findings challenge the degrees to which data papers are a distinct genre compared to research articles and they describe data‐centric research processes in a through way.
-
Examining scientific writing styles from the perspective of linguistic complexity
- Motivation: Publishing articles in high‐impact English journals is difficult for non‐native English‐speaking scholars
- Research Gap: uncover the differences in English scientific writing between native English‐speaking scholars (NESs) and NNESs
- Proposed method:
- examined the scientific writing styles in English from a two‐fold perspective of linguistic complexity:
- (a) syntactic complexity, including measurements of sentence length and sentence complexity;
- (b) lexical complexity, including measurements of lexical diversity, lexical density, and lexical sophistication.
- Findings: The observations suggest marginal differences between groups in syntactical and lexical complexity.
-
Modeling the relationship between scientific and bibliographic classification for music
- Motivation: Scientific classification is an important topic in contemporary knowledge organization discourse
- Research gap: the nature of the relationships between scientific and bibliographic classifications has not been fully studied.
- Proposed method:
- start from the connections between scientific and bibliographic classifications for music
- Three relationship characteristics are posited: similarity, causation, and time.